But those are different trials with different durations and doses, and cagrilintides strongest data are as the CagriSema combination, so any ranking is a cross-trial inference rather than a proven result
My feeling is that if you use any smaller gauge of needle you risk damaging the surrounding tissue at the injection site
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) has published some useful flowcharts to guide researchers who suspect fraud in manuscripts or published articles: Image manipulation in a published article (COPE, 2018a) How to recognise potential authorship problems (COPE, 2018b) Systematic manipulation of the publication process (COPE, 2018c) How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process (COPE, 2017) If you suspect fabricated data in a submitted manuscript (Wager, 2006a) Ghost, guest, or gift authorship in a submitted manuscript (Wager, 2006b) Undisclosed conflict of interest Plagiarism in a submitted manuscript (Wager, 2006c) 34.8 Confirmation Bias, scientific misconduct and the paradox of high-flying academic careers Scientists are human, and humans are fallible
And the difference between "fixing a real deficiency" and "megadosing when you're already fine" is the difference between a genuine improvement and expensive urine
He was amazing, man
*Please Note: The patient portal and supplements store require separate logins, each with its own unique credentials